Justin Welby is on a mission to destroy the church
The Arch-Bishop of Canterbury has made these heretical statements
1] Is coming out as a supporter of homosexuality in defiance of the bible. 2] Leading the church down a new age Buddhist line. 3] Doubting the very existence of God 4] Say's no need to repent of sin & reject the devil. 5] Introducing Paganism into the church
Nature is to reproduce - that is natural reproduction. Misuse of any organ has dire consequences. Homosexuality is none reproductive. God and mother nature go hand in hand. This is not a church, its a business re-marketing itself with no God or nature in mind.
Welby is a jew jew (1) the stated aim of the jews is the destruction of christianity, to this end they put up paid stooges to blame the vatican and catholics for all ills ( 2 ) they introduced in socialists and homosexuals into the church to destroy it, exactly as the fatima prophecies say ( 3 ) The likes of welby have deliberately alienated their followers time and time again ( 4) the churches are empty and closing by the week this is part of the plan
1. God's view of same-sex relationships is hardly explored, in the hardly-any-posts 'heresies..' website. Come on, Tap, of all places uncovers the fuller picture and yet here we have the missing counter claim. 2. JW is an evangelical-archbishop, particularly in his role, public appreciation of Buddhism is appropriate. 3. Along with God's mighty John Wesley and many other... evangelicals. 4. Find JW saying... what? 5. That's all well established from the first few centuries. The less written about questions from Plato to Calvin and beyond. This is where the truther should dig.
As for JW, I can't see what significant difference he has, or could make, in theology or common practice.
Peace, but if we're going to 'do God' let's do '...' properly, Mark.
This is a different question. If true, and certainly other famous faces have testimony against them, we'd have a different JW to deal with. Let's assume innocence so far and if bothered, understand JW and all, in the sharpest light - something you like to do
I should have written, '...compelling testimony', I sadly must listen for the voices that claim to witness him. Others, I have to agree, we're probably there. Mark
were.. (typo). Tap, this area needs careful reporting and analysis. It's one to get right.
This is my girlfriend's comment: 'I can't say I quite understand why Tap dredged that one up on to the site except to provoke debate, which it has. Your comments wise and measured'.
Well, as P.T. Barnum once said, I don’t care what you call me, just don’t spell my name wrong. And listen friend, check out your dictionary at what psychopath really means. Nothing’s being imagined, graves or otherwise – but lots is being denied, including by you. cheers, Kevin Annett
The enemies of God have been trying to change and corrupt The Word of God for the last 2000 years.
God came to earth, in the flesh - and TPTB, the fallen angels, led by the god of this world Satan, murdered Him.
What do think they've been trying to do to The Word of God and Christians ever since?
The Latin title of the pope is 'Vicarius Christi', which they state means Vicar of Christ - but Vicarius Christi is direct translations from Koine Grees of the New Testament, and means 'anti christos' (ἀντίχριστος), one definition of which is 'the adversary of the Messiah'
There is your enemy. Rome, Vatican and their army the Jesuits.
I became a Christian 3 years ago. Every church I have attended in England has been, and still is, deeply corrupted.
The Church of England is owned and controlled by Rome and the Jesuits, and so are even ALL the Baptist churches. All of them - and I've been around quite a few!
2 Corinthians 2:17
Viewing the King James Version. Click to switch to 1611 King James Version of 2 Corinthians 2:17.
Paul the apostle new of this:
'For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.'
2 Corinthians 2:17
In all modern, corrupted bible versions, this line reads:
'Unlike so many, we do not peddle the word of God for profit. On the contrary, in Christ we speak before God with sincerity, as those sent from God.'
Ha Ha ! A totally different meaning..! There was literally no one selling the word of God in the 1st century!
This is one of many examples of the total corruption of these 'new age' bible versions. There are hundreds of changes, all part of their attempt to change The Word of God into some New Age Pagan nonsense.
And then you switch to suggesting 'there is your enemy' - Jesuits etc.
This isn't the most accurate assessment, although embedded. 'Globalist Illuminati New World Order', better names the physical perpetrators. I'm not convinced it's - all about - The Vatican. The City of London with Washington on the other hand more the map. Zionists and Jesuits in the mix although neither the exclusive mixers.
'Ha Ha ! A totally different meaning..!'
Ha Ha ? ? Can you explain why 'peddle' (albeit probably not the better translation) makes such a difference? Eye of a needle comes to mind.
JW is not 'on my side' but I reserve judgement to disassociate or call out as...
Judge not comes to mind. Judge righteous my man. What have you said about JW? Nothing.
You say; 'I became a Christian 3 years ago. Every church I have attended in England has been, and still is, deeply corrupted. '
Oh. I feel for you. Get over it. Humble yourself. Don't 'go' if not comfortable but watch the corruption claims. Three years in and the whole lot (of us) deeply...
Come on, it's a spectrum, at best we have... oh 5pm, AJ's on.
Any one of those five would be enough to have you beheaded in Islam.
ReplyDeleteNature is to reproduce - that is natural reproduction.
ReplyDeleteMisuse of any organ has dire consequences.
Homosexuality is none reproductive.
God and mother nature go hand in hand.
This is not a church, its a business
re-marketing itself with no God or nature in mind.
Welby is also on trial by the ITCCS-see K.vin Annett
ReplyDeleteSorry-that should read "Kevin"
ReplyDeleteWelby is a jew jew
ReplyDelete(1) the stated aim of the jews is the destruction of christianity, to this end they put up paid stooges to blame the vatican and catholics for all ills
( 2 ) they introduced in socialists and homosexuals into the church to destroy it, exactly as the fatima prophecies say
( 3 ) The likes of welby have deliberately alienated their followers time and time again
( 4) the churches are empty and closing by the week this is part of the plan
1. God's view of same-sex relationships is hardly explored, in the hardly-any-posts 'heresies..' website. Come on, Tap, of all places uncovers the fuller picture and yet here we have the missing counter claim.
ReplyDelete2. JW is an evangelical-archbishop, particularly in his role, public appreciation of Buddhism is appropriate.
3. Along with God's mighty John Wesley and many other... evangelicals.
4. Find JW saying... what?
5. That's all well established from the first few centuries. The less written about questions from Plato to Calvin and beyond. This is where the truther should dig.
As for JW, I can't see what significant difference he has, or could make, in theology or common practice.
Peace, but if we're going to 'do God' let's do '...' properly, Mark.
PS, Tap, I had a look at matey boys 'heresies...' twoddle. A nasty and silly site. But thanks for stirring more right debate.
ReplyDeleteI rarely comment, you provoked, and this. I'm sure you'll like:
http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/09/21/interviewing-the-dead-albert-einstein-about-free-will/#comments
Mark
Welby is accused by the ITCCS of involvement in The Ninth Circle - ritual child torture, rape and killing.
ReplyDeleteThis is a different question. If true, and certainly other famous faces have testimony against them, we'd have a different JW to deal with. Let's assume innocence so far and if bothered, understand JW and all, in the sharpest light - something you like to do
ReplyDeleteMark
I should have written, '...compelling testimony', I sadly must listen for the voices that claim to witness him. Others, I have to agree, we're probably there. Mark
ReplyDeletewere.. (typo). Tap, this area needs careful reporting and analysis. It's one to get right.
ReplyDeleteThis is my girlfriend's comment: 'I can't say I quite understand why Tap dredged that one up on to the site except to provoke debate, which it has. Your comments wise and measured'.
Anon. 1.29 and 1.30:
ReplyDeletewould that be the Kevin Annett who famously faked finding a mass grave on the Six Nations reserve in Ontario?
If true, 'we'd have a different KA to deal with. Let's assume innocence so far...' and, so far, what's been KA's response?
ReplyDeleteMark
oh and here is ...KA:
ReplyDeleteWell, as P.T. Barnum once said, I don’t care what you call me, just don’t spell my name wrong. And listen friend, check out your dictionary at what psychopath really means. Nothing’s being imagined, graves or otherwise – but lots is being denied, including by you. cheers, Kevin Annett
http://www.genuinewitty.com/2012/04/10/2060/
The enemies of God have been trying to change and corrupt The Word of God for the last 2000 years.
ReplyDeleteGod came to earth, in the flesh - and TPTB, the fallen angels, led by the god of this world Satan, murdered Him.
What do think they've been trying to do to The Word of God and Christians ever since?
The Latin title of the pope is 'Vicarius Christi', which they state means Vicar of Christ - but Vicarius Christi is direct translations from Koine Grees of the New Testament, and means 'anti christos' (ἀντίχριστος), one definition of which is 'the adversary of the Messiah'
There is your enemy. Rome, Vatican and their army the Jesuits.
I became a Christian 3 years ago. Every church I have attended in England has been, and still is, deeply corrupted.
The Church of England is owned and controlled by Rome and the Jesuits, and so are even ALL the Baptist churches. All of them - and I've been around quite a few!
2 Corinthians 2:17
Viewing the King James Version. Click to switch to 1611 King James Version of 2 Corinthians 2:17.
Paul the apostle new of this:
'For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ.'
2 Corinthians 2:17
In all modern, corrupted bible versions, this line reads:
'Unlike so many, we do not peddle the word of God for profit. On the contrary, in Christ we speak before God with sincerity, as those sent from God.'
Ha Ha ! A totally different meaning..! There was literally no one selling the word of God in the 1st century!
This is one of many examples of the total corruption of these 'new age' bible versions. There are hundreds of changes, all part of their attempt to change The Word of God into some New Age Pagan nonsense.
JW is on their side, not yours and mine!
God Bless You
Lots to unpack in what you say. I'll add my thrupence worth later, Mark.
ReplyDelete'What do think they've been trying to do ?'
ReplyDeleteUp to this point all sounds sound.
And then you switch to suggesting 'there is your enemy' - Jesuits etc.
This isn't the most accurate assessment, although embedded. 'Globalist Illuminati New World Order', better names the physical perpetrators. I'm not convinced it's - all about - The Vatican. The City of London with Washington on the other hand more the map. Zionists and Jesuits in the mix although neither the exclusive mixers.
'Ha Ha ! A totally different meaning..!'
Ha Ha ? ? Can you explain why 'peddle' (albeit probably not the better translation) makes such a difference? Eye of a needle comes to mind.
JW is not 'on my side' but I reserve judgement to disassociate or call out as...
Judge not comes to mind. Judge righteous my man. What have you said about JW? Nothing.
You say; 'I became a Christian 3 years ago. Every church I have attended in England has been, and still is, deeply corrupted. '
Oh. I feel for you. Get over it. Humble yourself. Don't 'go' if not comfortable but watch the corruption claims. Three years in and the whole lot (of us) deeply...
Come on, it's a spectrum, at best we have... oh 5pm, AJ's on.
Peace
Mark
ReplyDeleteJW is not 'on my side' - I don't know ? More or less. Or not at all. I guess - another sleeping one aside - hope he's what he seems.
Hope, he's what..? not, 'that', demonised.
ReplyDelete