Translate

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Councils target newborn babies for removal from parents to get government incentives

Councils making millions in incentives after snatching record numbers of babies for adoption

Councils are being offered bonuses of millions of pounds if they meet controversial State adoption targets.
Confidential figures obtained by the Daily Mail show that £36million in 'reward grants' has been promised to English councils in an attempt by Labour to increase adoptions of children by 50 per cent.
The money-earning targets were introduced by Tony Blair in 2000 and were intended to lift more older children out of the care system.
But critics say it is the most 'adoptable' babies and children under four who are being removed in the biggest numbers.

Scroll down for more...
{2}
More than 900 newborn babies are now being taken from their mothers each year, a 300 per cent increase in little more than a decade.
The number of children aged between a week and a month removed from their parents has risen to 1,300 annually, a rise of 141 per cent in the same time.
In the past two weeks alone, eight newborn babies have been taken from their mothers at hospitals in Newcastle and North Tyneside.
The number is so high there are not enough foster parents in the area. One baby - thought to be the ninth taken from its parents - is being cared for in a special hospital unit because there is no foster home available.
Liberal Democrat MP John Hemming has demanded an explanation.
He said: "We are seeing a massive increase in the forced removal of newborns. Babies are being taken before they can even be breastfed. Social workers are seizing very young children on the flimsiest of excuses and giving them to other families.
"This smacks of social engineering on a grand scale. The offer of monetary rewards for meeting the targets has created a frenzy among social workers. There are council targets for recycling rubbish and now targets for recycling children."
Figures prepared by the Department for Local Government and Community Cohesion show that two councils - Essex and Kent - were offered more than £2million over three years to encourage additional adoptions.

Four others - Norfolk, Gloucestershire, Cheshire and Hampshire - were promised £1million in extra funds.
Critics say very young children are specifically selected - even before birth - by social workers to get the bonuses. It is believed that 1,000 each year are wrongly taken from their parents.
Last week a court ruled that a couple whose first three children were taken for adoption should keep their fourth, now a year old.

Abuse allegations against Mark and Nicky Webster turned out to be false. But they will never see their three lost children again because adoptions are irreversible.
Despite the cash inducements, adoptions of older children - the very ones who were meant to be helped - have dropped dramatically.
The number of over-sevens adopted in England has fallen from 100 in 1996 to 50 last year out of a total of 5,400 adoptions.

Beverley Beech, of the Association for Improvements in the Maternity Services - a body which advises new mothers - said: "The Government is denying that social workers are targeting babies for adoption.

"But the desperate calls on our helpline from pregnant women who have already been told by social workers, for no good reason, that they will lose their babies immediately they are born, or from mothers of new babies taken for adoption, prove these denials are not true."
Campaigners also want an opening up of family courts, where adoptions are overseen in utmost secrecy. Parents are warned that if they tell anyone - even their closest family - what goes on they could face prison for contempt of court.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-465563/Councils-making-millions-incentives-snatching-record-numbers-babies-adoption.html#ixzz2wJY6Lodh
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is like something from the old soviet union, there is talk of anyone who is a dissident having their children taken by the state
its just aw3ful being in the UK now with all this government terror

Anonymous said...

"This is like something from the old soviet union...."

Hate to burst your bubble but this IS the soviet union. We are effectively a society living under tyrannical authoritarianism, enforced upon us by a minority of Jews but just no gulags.....yet.

The USSR was merely the guinea-pig of communism before they unleashed it on the rest of the world. The Chinese were a walkover. They've been a slave people for millennia. The west however is harder to crack. History tells us of the many peoples within who fought against oppression, most notably the Celts and the Germanic tribes.

The people within society will only stop the rapid drive into the totalitarian New World Order by popping off top figures within society. You WILL NOT beat this order by going through the courts. They OWN the courts and they CREATE the legislation that binds you into slavery.

Society is going to get worse, not worse then better, just progressively worse. This will be a result of people realising that they have no way of fighting back against the state and the system. Every aspect of their lives will be monitored. What they do, what they think, what they say, how they fell, where they go, whom they partner with....all will be decided by the all powerful state.

Am I sad?
Nope.
Do I feel sorry for the people?
Nope.
They've created this hell that we're living in. They've accepted the immoral, unnatural, decadent existence of society and people within. They've been 100% responsible in building, working for and protecting the state and the elites who created it, that is destroying all freedom and liberty on this planet.

You have a choice.

1. Fight back - physically. Expect to become an enemy of the state if you do so. Expect to be alienated from your friends and family and become a social pariah. Expect your world to be turned upside down, living in limbo, unable to walk the streets without the police and security services looking for you. Expect your family to be under constant surveillance.....

2. Do nothing and remain inside the prison that becomes more inescapable by the minute.

This is the choice all humans who wish to be free face - either take the war against the state or stay inside their prison you're happily living within.

Negative? Yes. Realistic? Of course.

Harbinger

Anonymous said...

P.S.

If the state really had any care for humans, why then does it launch wars all over the place?

Anonymous said...

Social Services are basically the 'legal' version of child snatchers.

They will do it covert and at a slow pace in order to not attract too much attention. The first step is to break the male away from the family bond. This is straight out of the Marxist textbook: make children the 'children of the state'.

Eventually they will get the children and they will then be syphoned off for adoption or vanish into the pedophile rings that are so rampant.

Regards
- Cobalt

Anonymous said...

Harbinger,

Right on the money!! It is only a matter of time before the people start to revolt physically & when the "gestapo" are attacked and further threatened will any change begin to be evident. These thugs are fine as long they are still in control. As you said, there is absolutely no mileage in expecting any semblance of justice via the courts so physical action will become the only way out, and it WILL happen.

reiverdave

Anonymous said...

they want ya children so they can nonce them up ....plan as the nose on ya face....wake up people it been going on for donkey years ..don't cha know ..well you do now!! My guess is people will turn a blind eye ..like they have done for years ...If not cya at number 10 soon ......

Anonymous said...

Local councils, the primary vehicle of Common Purpose.

The way to gauge any organisations morality and legitimacy are the wages paid to those at the top.

For some years now council CEO's have been receiving salaries which far outweight their capabilities or standing. Many have links to organised crime and Common Purpose, an example being Glasgow's "Percy" Purcell, just one of many. Many of them are dual passport holders too.

Part of the big wages are to keep schtum about the missapropriation of the taxes rolling in which have been held in foreign banks for transfer to a certain middle eastern country, and other immoral activities to raise funding for it.

Its all part of the worldwide "farming" of the cattle to fund the new jerusalem.

Unsure about this?..then ask yourselves who is funding the new super cities in Khazakstan, Prince Andrews recent multiple holidays destination.

Just how is a small landlocked country with no visible means of trade funding the extensive building and regeneration?

Dimps said...

I have personal experience of this matter. My daughter got pregnant at 16 ss got involved and planned on taking the baby as soon as he was born, my daughter fought against them tooth and nail, they even shipped her to a secure unit with the baby to be monitored 24/7 by cctv (even the toilet). When the six months were up they still wanted my grandson even though there was no evidence to state my daughter was unable to care for him. My daughter lived under the constant threat of her child being snatched at any time, as her appointed social worker enjoyed telling her. After many court(closed family court) appearances which I the maternal grandmother was forbidden to attend, my daughter finally(2 years) won the right to bring up her child. On one of the court occasions my daughter happened to see a file for prospective adoptive parents which the court advocate had left in her presence describing my grandson as a sales product stating his temperament, eye colour,hair colour, health condition etc... This is happening to many many young mothers who have no voice and no support outside ss. My grandson is with us today because my daughter fought hard for 2 years and NEVER lost hope.Family courts should be open, what have they to hide? Plenty! the fact that they are stealing babies from loving parents oh and the social worker who gets the baby adopted earns a tidy bonus, I have heard, around the 30 grand mark. Sick sick sick...

Anonymous said...

harbinger is right and this is why so many many intelligencr people and police are whistleblowing just now, people are very worried about government corruption and erversion, just see this about clarissa dixon wright, reminded me of something she told a close freind, she was given the TV how as a thanks for keeping her mouth shut about all the perverts in new labour, gay gordon s wife is paid a good sum each year to act the part of his wife, his job was to pass on all the gold cheaply to rothschild my belief was gordons wife was his controller

sovereigntea said...

http://www.roseanneworld.com/blog/2014/03/operation-spade-joint-hammer-nest-egg-delego-etc-lead-back-tymoshenkos-ukraine/

Indeceny Conviction
http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/110659303

The Communist BBC Owned the Langham Hotel Lord Victor Rothschild - Boothby - Philby - http://www.westendatwar.org.uk/page_id__115_path__0p28p.aspx

See links at the end of this

http://aangirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/nazi-provocateurs-kill-two-in-crimea.html

sovereigntea said...

NWO Players Cameron BofE IMF US State Dept EU & BBC all linked financing BBC Media Action who have been particularly active in the Ukraine, many EU border states along with Libya and Syria.


Shady Ukraine Linked BBC Charity Funded Out Of US State Dept & UK Foreign Aid (DFID) Budget

http://www.sovereignindependentuk.co.uk/2014/03/19/shady-bbc-charity-funded-out-of-foreign-aid-dfid-budget/

working with a common purpose progression of imperial State Capitalism ( Communitarian Communism )

Anonymous said...

lord Rothschild told the apostles those homosexual communists, that they would be the vanguard in taking over the west, and look at today rothschild is king, they steal our money take our kids and teach them perversion, churchill knew this which is wht he disarmed us in the twenties when many were saying lets revolt after W W 1

Anonymous said...

I have several relations who work in various security capacities, and the establishment is terrified of all the info that is coming out via the internet, BTW its not Rupert murdoch who is funding people to attack whistleblowers its a small office with people funded by him

Anonymous said...

Yes i agree ...Brain dead f wits ..yes sir yes sir three bags full ....