Translate

Saturday, April 30, 2011

Was Diana 'Taken Out'? If So, Why?

David Shayler and Annie Machon left MI6, and revealed details of government involvement in the London Tube bombing.

They also had an experience concerning the investigation of the Paris road crash which killed Diana.



There is no mention in the video of David Icke.  That's false billing.  To confuse.

This is a very brave lady, who mentions the risks they underwent to investigate the Diana evidence.

She says Diana was taken out, as she was about to give public support to the Palestinians.  Details of how she knows, is in the clip.

If Diana was alive now, she'd be standing up for Libya, no doubt, and speaking out against all the oil/currency wars.  I don't think she'd want William posing it in his RAF uniform, while the RAF are bombing innocent civilians, or having such a military background to his wedding.

That's why the OWG took her out.  She believed in humanity, unlike her husband, who, as a stooge of The One World Government, thinks we are all a carbuncle on the arse of the earth,  √°nd should have our numbers reduced by subtle and not so subtle interventions.

Unlike compliant Charles, she just wouldn't fit the new world post-911 in which the USA wanted access and control in every country around the globe, a world in which these kind of things happen every day.

News from Libya just in -

Just seen on the news that NATO have just murdered one of Gaddafi's sons' and three of his grandchildren. That is sickening news. It is also illegal according to the current terms of their so-called mandate. But, I don't suppose that will trouble them unduly.  (commenter on Political Betting)


The attempts to 'David Icke' David Shayler and Annie Machon are all an attempt to discredit them (which adds to the evidence that Icke is a media plant, paid to act as a disinformant, mixing the truth with evident nonsense).  


Shayler, who is now photographed and presented as a transvestite megalomaniac, has been threatened of course.  How would you react?  His earlier persona was totally convincing, and his expo on the London 7/7 bombings highly professional.  It is well worth watching his videos on Youtube about the London Tube bombing.  The Shayler assessment of Diana's death is equally an important piece of evidence, not previously made known.  I was very surprised to find it.


Another Briton who tried to stand in their way and met his death was Robin Cook.  Shayler and Machon survive maybe as they know the system, and have prepared a cocktail of revelations to be handed out if they don't make it.







AMERICA'S "WAR ON TERRORISM"
by Michel Chossudovsky
ISBN 0-9737147-1-9  (2005)
387 pages.
Global Research Online Price: US$14.00  (Retail $19.95)  
NEW: The Book is now available in pdf format at US $8.25 (scroll down for details)

In this new and expanded edition of Michel Chossudovsky's 2002 best seller, the author blows away the smokescreen put up by the mainstream media, that 9/11 was an attack on America by "Islamic terrorists".  Through meticulous research, the author uncovers a military-intelligence ploy behind the September 11 attacks, and the cover-up and complicity of key members of the Bush Administration.
The expanded edition, which includes twelve new chapters focuses on the use of 9/11 as a pretext for the invasion and illegal occupation of Iraq, the militarisation of justice and law enforcement and the repeal of democracy.
According to Chossudovsky, the  "war on terrorism" is a complete fabrication based on the illusion that one man, Osama bin Laden, outwitted the $40 billion-a-year American intelligence apparatus. The "war on terrorism" is a war of conquest. Globalisation is the final march to the "New World Order", dominated by Wall Street and the U.S. military-industrial complex.
September 11, 2001 provides a justification for waging a war without borders. Washington's agenda consists in extending the frontiers of the American Empire to facilitate complete U.S. corporate control, while installing within America the institutions of the Homeland Security State.

Agenda 21 Means The Agenda For The World In The 21st Century



The UN's plan for the 21st Century.

Do you know anything about it?

This is the future of the world.

Why don't you know about it?

Watch the video, and learn.

And this...

Butchers Parading As Peacocks


William back to work next week.  Blood on our hands.



The day before the Royal Wedding, we bomb Gaddafi's private residence wounding 45 people, 15 seriously.  Some no fly zone.  The next day we parade our finest to the world.  We are nothing but butchers parading as peacocks.  The day after that we murder Gaddafi's son and grandchildren.  Humanitarian mission?  A massacre of the innocents more like.

RT VIDEO BELOW -


UN Resolution 1973 was based on false allegations.  Gaddafi had not bombed Tripoli at all.  The British investigator who found the UN's Casus Belli to be entirely false, was arrested as he arrived back at Heathrow, and has, so far, not been released.


NATO bombing is killing far more people than is being admitted.  The 'rebels' are killing civilians with machetes, but nothing is being reported on the news.  It's on Youtube.  


What the hell do we think we're doing getting involved in this?  


And why do we think it's OK to put on a worldwide joyful celebration while these terrible acts are being committed by our nation?  


We should be ashamed, and we should get out.







Plans to attack Libya have been longstanding. The imperial war machine of the United States, Britain, France, Italy, and their NATO allies is involved in a new military adventure that parallels the events that led to the wars against Yugoslavia and Iraq. The war machine has been mobilized under the cover of “humanitarian intervention.”

In fact what the Pentagon and NATO have done is breach international law by intervening on the side of one of the combating parties in Libya in a civil war that they themselves have encouraged and fuelled. They have not protected civilians, but have launched a war against the Libyan regime in Tripoli and actively assisted the Benghazi-based Transitional Council in fighting the Libyan military.

Before the rapprochement with Colonel Qaddafi, for years the U.S., Britain, France, and their allies worked to destabilize Libya. Confirmed by U.S. government sources, Washington attempted regime change in Tripoli several times.[1] According to General Wesley Clark, former NATO commander, the Pentagon had active plans for launching a war against Libya.


NEWS JUST IN -  just seen on the news that NATO have just murdered one of Gaddafi's sons' and three of his grandchildren. That is sickening news. It is also illegal according to the current terms of their so-called mandate. But, I don't suppose that will trouble them unduly.


Here's one for DAVID CAMERON to watch.  


Gaddafi's soldiers executed in cold blood after surrendering.






The Royal Wedding

The celebration of capital's domination of democracy
EXTRACT
That is dictatorship by elite government for an unelected elite. The same dictatorship manifests in the US and other Western powers. Ordinary Americans in particular may look at the British royal wedding pageant with mild fascination as some kind of “old Europe curiosity”. But in spite of its supposed revolution against European monarchs, the US has today reinvented its own corporate and financial aristocracy that rules and plunders without democratic accountability in alliance with the oligarchies of Europe.

The real world nexus for our global oligarchy is seen graphically in the power of oil companies and the transnational banking system. Britain’s Queen Elizabeth, one of the world’s top 10 richest individuals, has a personal fortune that is reckoned to far exceed her country’s $130 billion deficit cuts. She is a major shareholder in Royal Dutch Shell and British Petroleum – these companies along with Exxon and Chevron make up the “four horsemen” of global Big Oil.

As Dean Henderson, author of Big Oil and Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf, points out:

“The Four Horsemen have interlocking directorates with the international mega-banks. Exxon Mobil shares board members with JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Deutsche Bank, Royal Bank of Canada and Prudential. Chevron Texaco has interlocks with Bank of America and JP Morgan Chase. BP Amoco shares directors with JP Morgan Chase. RD/Shell has ties with Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase, N. M. Rothschild & Sons and Bank of England.”

Henderson continues: “Information on RD/Shell is harder to obtain since they are registered in the UK and Holland and are not required to file 10K reports. It is 60% owned by Royal Dutch Petroleum of Holland and 40% owned by Shell Trading & Transport of the UK. The company has only 14,000 stockholders and few directors. The consensus from researchers is that Royal Dutch/Shell is still controlled by the Rothschild, Oppenheimer, Nobel and Samuel families along with the British House of Windsor and the Dutch House of Orange.” 



Finian Cunningham


WAS DIANA ASSASSINATED?

Kids Teeth. Fluoride A Deadly Deception.


Fluorosed teeth after taking fluoride tablets for ten years.  Not quite what they told you would happen.

Fluoride poisons pretty much every part of the body, the brain, the nervous system, the cells, and the bones.  Low doses longterm kill,and accelerate ageing and wasting diseases.  It reduces the IQ of babies unborn as it penetrates the placenta, and dumbs down kids of all ages.  Why they want our children to consume it is beyond any kind of sensible explanation.  They claim it aids the strength of enamel in the teeth.  In fact fluoride rips the minerals out of the teeth and erodes them.

In Canada, they publicised a campaign for kids to  reduce cavities.  They should rinse their mouths with watered down milk of magnesia before retiring.  This, together with rationing of sweets, achieves a result far beyond anything claimed for fluoride.

From The Devil's Poison - How Fluoride Is Killing You.  by Dean Murphy DDS.


People should be filtering all their water down to 1 micron (as well as taking out fluoride with a special absorption filter.  Fluoride compound molecules are below 1 micron), changing to healthy, non-fluoride, detergent-free toothpastes, and avoiding salt which is also fluoridated through government intervention (use sea salt which you grind yourself).  The game is to get you and your kids to consume lots of fluoride, which is killing you.  Cigarettes are also loaded with fluoride.

Fluoride was known as the Devil's Poison for over a century as it was known to kill and injure those exposed to it, until it was rebranded in the USA in the 1940s and sold as a health product.  Why they want to kill people deiberately, I can't say.  But there is no doubt that that is exactly what they are doing.

When the story of the OWG's Human Depopulation Programme comes to be told, Fluoride will be Chapter One.  Killing people makes our existence on the planet more sustainable, apparently, according to those like Prince Charles who supports the UN's Depopulation Agendas.

Fluoride also ensures the profits of the pharmaceutical companies as otherwise healthy people are condemned to live shorter but also chronically depressed and sick lives.  Fluoride and its compounds are your enemy.  Be aware.  Don't become a victim of ignorance.  Turn off your TV, and read.  It won't take you long to realise that the fluoride game is a deadly deception.

In Sweden fluoride is banned.

http://www.radioliberty.com/ThePopulationControlAgenda.pdf

Friday, April 29, 2011

David Irving - ''Hitler Tried To Protect The Jews''



Irving demonstrates that on Kristalnacht, when 60 or 70 Jews were murdered, Hitler tried his best to stop the madness of what was happening, sending out continual messages through the night to his deputies.

Irving shows evidence from 1942 that Hitler tried to defer the solution to the Jewish problem, postponing it until after the war was over.  There is no evidence that Hitler was implicated in what happened to the Jewish people in Germany.  On the contrary he tried to do what he could to save them, Irving says.

The story of Hitler the Madman was created to give the reason why Britain and her Empire had to be sacrificed to win the war.  In fact it wasn't true.  The international bankers who controlled Churchill wanted an end of the British Empire, to create a power vacuum that they could fill, with the spreading of Communism.  Hitler's offer to fight alongside the British to protect the British Empire from other aggressors, such as the Japanese, and to team up against the spread of communism, was rejected by Churchill.  Churchill was on the point of accepting the terms offered in July 1940, but realised that his own role as war leader would be over, and that he'd lose his position to the peace movement.

The British people wanted peace.  More than half the cabinet wanted peace.  Churchill knew from code-breaking that Hitler had ordered that no bombs be dropped on Britain.  Churchill told Ambassador Kennedy that he was very keen for the bombing of London to start, and Hitler's order to be reversed, as that would kill off the growing British peace movement, and help bring the Americans into the war.

The process of wars being created through deception by international bankers, in liaison with intelligence agencies, media and personally ambitious politicians, continues right up to the present day.

Here is another bit of Irving describing Churchill's reaction to bombing raids......................One thought.  He says Coventry is three hundred and fifty miles away from London.  More like a hundred, I'd have thought.  One verbal slip allowed.  I hope there aren't others.  It's dramatic stuff to listen to, and possibly very revealing.  Usual caveats apply.  But Irving's opinions tally with Irslinger's book, and with many of the comments being left by BRIT in recent days.  It all kinda rings true to me, and makes the story of the world since WW2, and events we witness today, more explicable, to see how Churchill was keen for the war to go on, for his own interests.



On the other hand, I wonder how it was that Hitler was unable to stop the killings of the Jews, if that is what he wished to do.  It's a subject I know little about to form a proper view.  But it is interesting to hear Irving talk, and give another side to the story we have heard so many time previously.  This next clip shows how awful the actions of the SS in the East against the Jews were, and how much hatred there was against them.  You need a strong stomach to even look at these events, let alone form an objective view of what actually happened.



But were there six million Jews available to be killed in Occupied Europe?  Apparently not.

Is the gas claimed to be used, capable of killing one or two thousand people at a time?  Again, apparently not.

Was Hitler a monster?  Those who study history's original sources, say he was not.  Here is an example.  Hitler loved higher German tradition, and desired to get rid of the influences of Bolshevism.  Hitler created jobs for 6 million unemployed.  The factories were well organised, with swimming pools, social security, and he inspired German youth.  He cut off international finance, and launched his own Central Bank, creating enormous wealth for Germany.  That is one reason why he has been vilified ever since.



Surely it would have been very difficult for Britain to embrace the Germans in an alliance against Bolshevism.  There would have had to be a joining of the hip for such an idea to succeed.  While Hitler might have been tolerated at a distance, becoming his best buddy would have been very difficult indeed to stomach.   But was turning down his overtures of peace worth a war that lost the empire, ruined us financially and killed millions?  It seems that these events are more complex than can be understood from any single perspective.

We can't turn the clock back, even if we wanted a different outcome.  But can we learn from history and see that the power of central bankers played a big role in starting and continuing wars, just as it does today....from the American War Of Independence onwards, up to Iraq and now Libya.  Somehow the influence of that power should be taken back, and the good things that Hitler could achieve by breaking free, and Gaddafi has delivered to Libya is what we all should be availing ourselves of.

But each time a political leader tries they end up assassinated, from Lincoln to Kennedy.  Our democracies are effectively neutralised by the overriding power that the central bankers and the cartels have created.   Whichever way we try to see a way out, the doors seem bolted.  But let's keep looking, just in case.

Thursday, April 28, 2011

Churchill Deconstructed


Churchill's own holocaust.  The untold story of The Bengal famine 1943, killing 4 million people.  There seems to be a lot more history yet to come out, which is very different from the version we were all taught at school.


In the David Irving clip below, Churchill's own quote was that ''the truth is so fragile that it has to be protected by a bodyguard of lies''.  He lied that Hitler was intending to attack the British Empire, in order to keep the war going.  Hitler always maintained that he had no wish to fight the British.  He offered to withdraw his armies from France, Poland and Czechoslovakia to bring peace with us.  But once America was in the war, it was too late to make peace with Hitler.

By the end of the war there was the need to hide the fact that the war we had fought was a worthless mistake, which had ruined the country and lost our empire.  Power yielded to the Americans, whose power we fell into, out of the need to win the war with Hitler that Churchill insisted we keep fighting.  This gave rise to the myth which began in 1945 creating Hitler as an exceptional mass murderer,so that that could be made the reason for the war's inevitability.  David Irving says that he, having no formal position in a university, is free to question the orthodox version of history, and in this clip, he explains how and why he does that, most successfully.

Churchill was acting in the interests of the bankers, who wanted the war to start and to keep going longer, and thereby,  bring an end to the British Empire and establish the power of communism across the globe.  So much for the great speeches we all were told saved our country.  They were works of propaganda easily the match of Goebbels.

Thanks to Derek in comments.  It's interesting, and worth a look.

Obama's Father A Chicago-Based Communist


The hospital wasn't called that in 1961!
expand picture by clicking

"Kenya (listed as Obama's father's nation of birth) wasn't called Kenya in 1961. It was the British East Africa Protectorate. It was not known as "Kenya" until 1963.

"In 1961, the hospital Obama was born in was NOT named the Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital , as shown on the above certificate. In 1961, the hospital Obama was born in was named the Kauaikeolani Children's Hospital. It did not change its name to the Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until it merged with the Kapiolani hospital system in 1978."


Frank Marshall Davis, to the right, Obama's real father

From www.aangirfan.com

I am going to toss out a theory here; a theory that explains why even though Obama was born here in Hawaii why there has been obfuscation over the birth certificate. The theory involves a minor scandal Obama needed hidden, yet was too trivial to be of use to either Hillary Clinton or John McCain during the 2008 campaign.


That is the real issue here. If there was anything at all to this claim that Obama is not a natural born citizen, both Hillary and McCain would not have hesitated to use it to remove Obama and win the White House. So there must be another explanation.


My theory is that the true original birth certificate for Barack Obama has a different name for the father than Barack Hussein Obama, Sr.The theory is that the original birth certificate lists one Frank Marshall Davis as the father and that the young Obama was born out of wedlock (a common enough occurrence during the 60s).


If true, this connects all the facts together in a reasonable manner.
Obama grew up pretending that the man married to his mother was his biological father, and took the Obama name into politics. The revelation that mom had had an affair and that Obama was illegitimate is an embarrassment, and in a tightly contested election race might be a small liability given Davis' support for Communism. 


But given that Davis was from Chicago, there is no question that Obama, in this scenario, is still a naturally born US citizen. McCain and Hillary could not have used the scandal of Obama being illigitimate without making Obama look like a victim of dirty politics. After all, Obama can hardly be blamed for the circumstances of his conception. But his deception regarding his last name is intentional on Obama's part and reason enough for Kagen to block the birther lawsuits to keep the original certificate hidden.


This scenario also explains the statement Obama made in the video about how his father served in WW2, because while Obama Sr. and later Soetero were too young to serve in WW2, the far older Frank Marshall Davis did in fact serve in WW2.
This seems to make the most sense to me.


Obama as a Communist loyal to his real father's politics would stack up nicely with his loyalty to the One World Government.  That's what being covered up, not so much his illegitimacy, as the political information as to who the President really is.   A believer in the programmes of the United Nations to end all nation states, all private property and collectivise humanity.  The cap fits.  



click to expand



There is more.  Many of Obama's relatives have connections to intelligence agencies.  His grandmother has an interesting history, as does his grandfather.  His mother, and his Kenyan father too.  CIA activities everywhere.  His father seemed keen to introduce Obama's mother to various political leaders around the world, a honey-trap queen.  The intelligence connections are endless.  Obama is CIA.  


Wayne Madsen explains some of the details...







From COMMENTS on www.aangirfan.com


Hi aangirfan, I just googled a few old maps of Africa and according to them it was called Kenya here in 1959:

http://www.euratlas.net/history/hisatlas/africa/195939AF.html

For 1 October 1961:

http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/map_item.pl

Colonial Africa 1920-1939:

http://www.sandafayre.com/atlas/afia.htm

It might be worth having a look at some others. see what you think anyway.



See other comments on www.aangirfan.com casting doubt on the assumptions made about the birth certificate, and a video.

Your Children Will Be Asked To 'Volunteer' To Be Sterilised To Save The Earth


She, Diana, instinctively had it right, and could not be allowed to continue.

Charles is an agitator on behalf of the United Nations' Agenda 21 and Habitat 2 programmes, which are bringing in worldwide communism, the end of the nation state, the end of private property and the collectivisation of humanity, not to mention a vast culling of our numbers.  See The Sustainable Prince by the late Joan Veon.  Agenda 21 is the United Nations' Agenda for the 21st Century, which 99.9% of humanity has never heard of.

Would you be happy for your children to 'volunteer' to be sterilised?  That's coming.


Central Banker and 'Sustainability' Agitator  (As The UN defines the term).  He must be aware of the depopulation programme. 


Williams' mother was a bit cooky, but she stood against endless warfare, and the separation of humanity into divide-and-control regional blocs, prior to the planned interventions to destroy our way of life.

The One World Government, the implications of which are now showing more clearly than they were at the time of her death, quite clearly sides with Charles, and he with them.

If only the world knew what Charles really gets up to with his United Nations buddies, and what they are planning for all our futures, people would not be watching royal weddings all dewy-eyed.  You'd think the assassination of the last Royal consort would have put some kind of dampener on things and made people demand to know what is going on.

But such things as the depopulation programme are kept well out of the public eye.

I hope William and Kate follow where his mother led, and they abandon the gross errors of Charles.  Or are they too setting on course to become yet more Central Banking agents of  world oppression?  I am sure the pressure is on them to cooperate, and do and say nothing which obstructs our enslavement by the most brutal totalitarian regime ever to walk the planet, The One World Government.

Royalty is being used to mesmerise the world's populations while the powerful accelerate their acquisition of power.  William has chosen a simple girl who thrives on all the attention, and might live a little longer than his mother by choosing not to notice the horrors being perpetrated while she luxuriates.  Who can blame William for cooperating with the dumbing down of Royalty as is necessary for his own survival?


Harry seems more interested in humanity.  Will he play a part in freedom's future course?

The fact that Harry gets bad media gives a clue.  They've spotted he's got his own mind and the media slags him off at every opportunity.  This anti-Royalist piece from Global Research uses anti-Harry propaganda as a way to have a go at the whole Establishment, when the things he's accused of are trivial enough, as you can see.  You have to kiss their feet to get good media, don't you know.  

The fact that he doesn't do that is encouraging, although he must feel a bit shocked at the amount of bad media he attracts.  Maturity and a sense of responsibility and understanding seem many years away, but if he has his mother's heart and not his 'father's' leaden shoes, there's hope that Royalty might still have a heart, and not just a wallet.  

Global Research on the royal wedding and Libya -

It's a far cry from the remote isle of Anglesey in Wales (also known as "RAF Valley") where Prince William has been based as a search and rescue pilot. Seemingly the couple have been sharing a rural home there and, according to a bar employee of the White Eagle at Rhoscolyn, quoted in the Daily Mail: “They’re just like any other young couple in love — until you realize they’ve got armed bodyguards on the next table.” Quite.

View of The White Eagle Pub and Rhoscolyn, Anglesey
White Eagle at Rhoscolyn

Perhaps his choice of a search and rescue career, was as an antidote to his younger brother Harry's public relations disasters, from going to a party in a Nazi uniform; calling in air strikes from a bunker in Afghanistan, to blow villagers to bits, wearing an emblem for the media there reading: "We do bad things to bad people" - and seemingly appropriating the motorcycle of a local, probably his cherished, only lifeline, in the remote region. There was also a bit of a storm when he referred, on video to an army colleague as "Our little Paki friend" and another as looking like "a raghead", according to the News of the World, who obtained the footage.

Prince William. by the way: "usually drinks bitter, perhaps a pint or two, and Kate sticks to white wine and sparkling water. He seems to enjoy our homemade burgers and chips. Kate prefers fish and salads,” the worker said.

Public relations seem to be somewhat strained by the wedding too. 


Apart from eye watering expense, declaring a three day holiday, licenses for street parties and celebrations as the country is involved in chastising others on human rights, and its armed forces, in which the two Princes are enlisted, are dropping missiles on Libya's small six million population, while the Defense Minister, Liam Fox, as The Guardian (27th April) elegantly puts it: " ... in recent days has been edging towards declaring Gaddafi a legitimate target." 


Assassinating Colonel Quaddaffi, is for most, unacceptable, and shocking. 


As Rick Rozoff poignantly wrote: "NATO aircraft had flown a total of 3,725 sorties and 1,550 strike sorties since the Western military bloc took command of the war against Libya ... " he added: "On Easter Sunday, when almost a third of humanity celebrated the resurrection of the Prince of Peace, NATO acknowledged bombing government targets in and near the cities of Misrata, Sirte, Mizdah and Zintan. Hours later NATO warplanes bombed the residence of Muammar Gaddafi, wounding 45 people, 15 seriously."(i)

We are the war criminals, yet again as we have so often been.  Supported by the media, our forces destroy countries, cultures and lives.  


Our Royal Family dare not say one word, and are seemingly supportive of the One World Government's actions.  


Our politicians are silent.  UKIP's opposition to the war is relative and cautious.  Only in blogs such as Global Research can the true story be found. 


What Brits don't yet realise is that they are fighting to suppress freedom.  Once all countries are suppressed and in the control of the OWG, we will also become its victims.  Our beloved armed forces will no longer be required.  The crowds in London this week are cheering not a glorious past that lives on, but the agents of their own coming destruction. 


This is how Charles is cleverly presented by the media with no mention of his supranational role -


Guardian extract



Although Harmony was a publishing flop, I urge you to dig through the remainder bins and find a copy. You will then realise that royal intransigence may soon present us with a national embarrassment which will make us forget last week's undoubtedly perky events.
I already knew that the heir was a mark for every type of homeopathic quack and new age conman, but never realised that he was an open target for cultists as well. His book shows nothing but contempt for the scientific method, seeing it as our curse rather than our salvation. He wants us to return to a pre-Renaissance world and find the shared "sacred geometry" of the vagina in the designs of disparate ancient buildings.
We must then look heavenwards and see mystical significance in the mean orbit of Mercury, which sits "within the orbit of the earth in such a proportion that it fits exactly over the pentagon at the heart of the five-pointed star".
It is the tale of The Da Vinci Code told by an idiot.
To say that Prince Charles's views are reactionary is to libel honest conservatives. His hatred of science, his dismissal of technologies that might feed the hungry and heal the sick, his barely disguised admiration for the Middle Ages, when the credulous peasantry picked organic crops and presented them to princes – rather like himself – can be found today only on the extreme right of the green movement.
His courtiers tell the press that his behaviour in no way shows that he is unfit to be king. He may have meddled in politics since the late 1960s, they say, but that does not mean he will carry on meddling when he is head of state. He may have suggested that drinking carrot juice and taking coffee bean enemas may help combat cancer, but that does not mean he will carry on delivering his uninformed and unsought opinions when his mother dies.
He may have ignored his constitutional role in the most outrageous fashion by bombarding ministers with suggestions and objections, but that will cease as well. Even though he is a 62-year-old, set in his cranky ways and surrounded by flatterers, he will change. Trust us, he will.


The media narrative is focused on whether Charles is fit to be king, ignoring the fact that he is already effectively a world emperor within the One World Government, and will be King regardless of popular opinion.  He is not popular.  Very clever stuff, it has to be said.  Except it's not difficult to find out the truth so it's not that clever.  Check out the links I give earlier in the post.



Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Gaddafi Part-Owns Juventus. Send InThe Marines..


Sorry Me Old Chum.  You're Making Too Much Money.

The objective of the war against Libya is not just its oil reserves (now estimated at 60 billion barrels), which are the greatest in Africa and whose extraction costs are among the lowest in the world, nor the natural gas reserves of which are estimated at about 1,500 billion cubic meters. In the crosshairs of "willing" of the operation “Unified Protector” there are sovereign wealth funds, capital that the Libyan state has invested abroad.


The Libyan Investment Authority (LIA) manages sovereign wealth funds estimated at about $70 billion U.S., rising to more than $150 billion if you include foreign investments of the Central Bank and other bodies. But it might be more. Even if they are lower than those of Saudi Arabia or Kuwait, Libyan sovereign wealth funds have been characterized by their rapid growth. When LIA was established in 2006, it had $40 billion at its disposal. In just five years, LIA has invested over one hundred companies in North Africa, Asia, Europe, the U.S. and South America: holding, banking, real estate, industries, oil companies and others.

In Italy, the main Libyan investments are those in UniCredit Bank (of which LIA and the Libyan Central Bank hold 7.5 percent), Finmeccanica (2 percent) and ENI (1 percent), these and other investments (including 7.5 percent of the Juventus Football Club) have a significance not as much economically (they amount to some $5.4 billion) as politically.

Libya, after Washington removed it from the blacklist of “rogue states,” has sought to carve out a space at the international level focusing on "diplomacy of sovereign wealth funds." Once the U.S. and the EU lifted the embargo in 2004 and the big oil companies returned to the country, Tripoli was able to maintain a trade surplus of about $30 billion per year which was used largely to make foreign investments. The management of sovereign funds has however created a new mechanism of power and corruption in the hands of ministers and senior officials, which probably in part escaped the control of the Gadhafi himself: This is confirmed by the fact that, in 2009, he proposed that the 30 billion in oil revenues go "directly to the Libyan people." This aggravated the fractures within the Libyan government.

U.S. and European ruling circles focused on these funds, so that before carrying out a military attack on Libya to get their hands on its energy wealth, they took over the Libyan sovereign wealth funds. Facilitating this operation is the representative of the Libyan Investment Authority, Mohamed Layas himself: as revealed in a cable published by WikiLeaks. On January 20 Layas informed the U.S. ambassador in Tripoli that LIA had deposited $32 billion in U.S. banks. Five weeks later, on February 28, the U.S. Treasury “froze” these accounts. According to official statements, this is "the largest sum ever blocked in the United States," which Washington held "in trust for the future of Libya." It will in fact serve as an injection of capital into the U.S. economy, which is more and more in debt. A few days later, the EU "froze" around 45 billion Euros of Libyan funds.

The assault on the Libyan sovereign wealth funds will have a particularly strong impact in Africa. There, the Libyan Arab African Investment Company had invested in over 25 countries, 22 of them in sub-Saharan Africa, and was planning to increase the investments over the next five years, especially in mining, manufacturing, tourism and telecommunications. The Libyan investments have been crucial in the implementation of the first telecommunications satellite Rascom (Regional African Satellite Communications Organization), which entered into orbit in August 2010, allowing African countries to begin to become independent from the U.S. and European satellite networks, with an annual savings of hundreds of millions of dollars.

Even more important were the Libyan investment in the implementation of three financial institutions launched by the African Union: the African Investment Bank, based in Tripoli, the African Monetary Fund, based in Yaound√© (Cameroon), the African Central Bank, with Based in Abuja (Nigeria). The development of these bodies would enable African countries to escape the control of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, tools of neo-colonial domination, and would mark the end of the CFA franc, the currency that 14 former French colonies are forced to use. Freezing Libyan funds deals a strong blow to the entire project. The weapons used by "the willing" are not only those in the military action called “Unified Protector.”

Il Manifesto, April 22, 2011

Translated from Italian by John Catalinotto. Global Research.

Royal Weeding Out Of Guest List


Why is the Bahraini Prince Salman not coming the the wedding?
He was invited.  And where is President Gaddafi's invitation?

Global Research -   The guest list points to cynical double standards in Britain’s foreign policy. 

As media analyst Paul Kane points out: “It is so telling, on so many different levels, for example, the contrast between Bahraini rulers, who get invited to the British royal wedding – something that is taken to epitomize and define the gentility and nobility and cultural achievement of the western elites – and Libyan rulers, who get munitions, presumably loaded with depleted uranium, on their heads.”


Finian Cunningham.


Ah, Bahrain, unlike Gadaffi, never issued their own currency.  
If you please the world's central bankers, you get invited to all the best parties, even if you murder and torture.  
If you don't please the central bankers, it makes no difference how good you are to the people you rule.  
You borrow and you pay interest, or you die.

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Labour Anti-EU Posturing Is A Load Of Balls


Ed Balls Straying Out Of Position Takes One In The Chops

What came first?  The chicken or the egg?

UKIP rising to 8% in the polls, or David Cameron selling out Britain?

The eurosceptic trend is clear to see and is not going away.  The Daily Express started running its quit-the-EU campaign, which has been mirrored to some extent by The Daily Mail.  The Lib Dems, the most strongly pro-EU party, are disintegrating.  UKIP are booming.  It's bound to be having an effect on the two bigger parties.

If only their posturing is seen to become a little more sceptic than it has been, especially Labour.   They are in opposition, where parties traditionally always claim to be eurosceptic with little danger of their falsehoods being put to the test.

This from Open Europe -


Peter Oborne: Is Labour “ditching” its commitment to Europe?
Writing on his Telegraph blog on Thursday, Peter Oborne argued that Labour may be reassessing its approach to Europe. Oborne argued that “By demanding that the clear bulk of the [bailout] financing should come from the eurozone, [Ed Balls, Shadow Chancellor] has also signalled that he is ditching New Labour’s long-term and very public strategy of co-operation with Europe.” Although the Labour party is still far from anti-EU, Oborne suggested that it is more eurosceptic that at any point over the past two decades, and that this approach may give the coalition government more strength to speak out against EU policies.

Writing in Monday’s Sun, Trevor Kavanagh argued that the UK should not contribute to further eurozone bailouts. Kavanagh also suggested that Labour could be set to take a tough new line on Europe.

Of course, the reality is that both the big parties have agreed to bail out the eurozone, and they won't be able to back out of Article 122 of the Lisbon Treaty, unless the 27 other Lisbon signatories agree.

We will see Labour pretending that this isn't so, from hereon, just as Cameron pretended to be eurosceptic when he was in opposition.

You could be forgiven for thinking that Labour saying they'll stop euro bail-outs, to be just another load of Balls.  


Another smack on the mouth appears due to this latest ''eurosceptic'' political chancer, as in the picture above...at the very least.


The Sun newspaper is yet another rag trying to climb on board the success being enjoyed by The Daily Express.  Sorry, Trevor, only EU exit will cut it with the readers these days.  


Talk of adjustment to policy is just more of the same kind of waffle we're entirely sick of.  


If it's ''Get Out'' you want to say,  Express it - or stop wasting our time...


As for Bilderberger Balls, the central bankers' placeman who ensured Britain's debts keep piling up year on year, next time he opens his lying mouth, the blow should be delivered to the more appropriate place.  

Monday, April 25, 2011

Cameron Won't Survive The End Of The Coalition



No coalition.  No majority.  Collapse of regime.  General Election.   In a word, Toast.

MOST LIBERAL DEMOCRATS ARE AIMING FOR AN ALLIANCE WITH LABOUR: David Cameron should be under no illusions as to who he's sharing his political bed with. Clegg is not the Liberal Democrat party. A few Orange Bookers including Clegg, Laws, Alexander and Browne are not representative although they've seized control of their party. Cable is closer to the true ideological centre of the Liberal Democrats and his Guardian interview, on Saturday, in which heopenly discussed building an anti-Tory progressive majority is the political project that most Liberal Democrats are working towards. We are in alliance with a party that largely wants our defeat.


This is on Conservative home under http://conservativehome.blogs.com/thetorydiary/2011/04/david-cameron-should-prepare-for-an-early-general-election.html

The only way for the right-minded vote to survive the end of the coalition between C and LD, and the creation of a new coalition between Labour and LD, is to form an immediate electoral arrangement with UKIP, who have risen recently to 8%.  That means dumping David Cameron.  Even then UKIP plus Conservative would be starting at 40% against Labour plus Lib Dem starting from 50%.

Yet a revolution in British politics on the right would trigger a whole new possibility as to the direction the country could go.  A party standing to get out of the EU would see a surge in support.  Farage should be in conflab with Conservative backbenchers right now.

If AV is rejected, and the coalition disintegrates,  Cameron and Hague are finished, their Lib Dem love-bombing strategy in tatters.  Remember that the law is being changed to facilitate joint emblems on ballot papers.  That will be UKIP/Conservative, not LDC as originally intended.

JOHN REDWOOD writes -


 We read that the Av campaign has just got nasty. Some tell us the Coalition is under stress owing to the new tough rows going on. I don’t think so.

             I do not believe Mr Huhne, after the referendum, will pursue the matter through the courts. When didn’t elections throw up contested claims and dubious facts? Have the Lib Dems never put out a leaflet which others thought misleading at best? How much does Mr Huhne think AV elections would cost?
            I do not believe Dr Cable will resign because he thinks the government ought to let in more migrants than Mr Cameron will allow. I am still trying to work out why he thinks the Lib Dems are stopping unpopular policies within government, when he was the architect of the higher tuition fees policy which so far has aroused more protest than anything else. Nor do I think Mr Clegg really believes our present system of voting is a right wing plot, when it has been accepted by most people for many decades, and has elected socialist as well as Conservative governments.

            The Lib Dems have to stick with the Coalition, whatever the result on 5 May. They after all are the believers in Coalition politics, so they have to go the extra mile to show us how it’s done in the national interest. They signed up to a 5 year Parliament and a 5 year programme, and voted through a piece of legislation to reinforce the 5 year run. Surely they would not tear up such a promise so soon after making it? How could they be trusted in any future coalition talks if that is the way they behaved this time round? What would they say to the electors about such a U turn, when the deal was a referendum on AV, not a guaranteed victory for AV.


That tallies with my comment -

The one factor that could stop the majors wanting to engineer an election would be UKIP going to 8%. The Conservatives would be toast. The OWG likes Cameron as he's fronting Libya. They will stop Clegg from pulling the rug. The antics are all media games
  

Princess Kaoru Nakamaru Explains The World Depopulation Programme

This is unusual - Royalty with a brain attached.

Shame about the other bloke in the clip talking, as he is not so convincing and overrides her far too much.  In fact he sounds half mad, but Princess Kaoru Nakamaru at the beginning tells the story very simply and well.  She saw the documentation outlining the plans to reduce the world's population in half, and she believed it.

Once she's finished talking, click the other fool off unless you like incomprehensible gibberish in an Italian accent.  He's meant to be a member of the Illuminati!  If that's the standard of intellect possessed by these inbred aristocrats over centuries, no wonder we're all effed!




He's all on about intergalactic threats bringing the world to an end by December 2012.  


He's either a genius or a complete fruitcake, 
announcing his prophecies in cartoon Italian accent.
His name is Prince Leo Lyon Zagami of Santa Elia, Sicily.   Prince Zagami came to Tokyo to meet Fulford and negotiate plans for future changes to benefit the people and the planet.


She explains that the media is controlled.


Youtube embed no longer available.


You have to click the link to watch.
Jesus was an Illumati.  Blah Blah.  The world comes to end on December 27th 2012.
Yawn.
War. Drugs. Death.
How about a change of direction, says Leo.....
Princess says the UFOs are trying to help us survive the current madness..
2012 to 2019 is the critical period.  Very nice meeting you, I'm sure.
Nutter.

But what about the Depopulation games of the OWG?  More here.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mp-hJXZ3J2s&feature=player_embedded#at=25


Princess Kaoru's a person we never hear about in the West.  Why?  This tells you the answer to that question.


TEXT CORRUPTED BY HANDS UNSEEN.  CLICK LINK.
The granddaughter of the Meiji Emperor, Princess Kaoru Nakamaru spent her early childhood in the Forbidden Castle in China. While at Columbia University and in graduate school, she furthered her research into international politics and since 1970, as a journalist, has interviewed kings and presidents, prime ministers and business people from many countries, and has given speeches, written books, and appeared on television as a commentator on international political affairs. In 1973, she was acclaimed in the U.S. magazine, Newsweek, as the “World’s No.1 interviewer,” and the Washington Post described her as “one of those rare women in the world with an outstanding international sensitivity.”
Later, she was producer, director, and interviewer of her own Japan/U.S. talk show, for which she traveled to war-torn areas around the world and carried out positive discussions with the heads of state of those countries. Among those were Colonel Gadhafi of Libya and then-president of Iraq, Saddam Hussein--figures that were considered hostile by the West. Nakamaru even covered the frontlines during the Iran-Iraq War (1980-88) and video taken of it was shown to President Hussein who suggested that the war be immediately halted. The images of her broadcast on TV pressing President Hussein with the question “Why is this war being continued?” and asking Colonel Gadhafi, “Are you really a terrorist?” drew strong reactions. From those experiences, she exerted her energy into “personal diplomacy,” serving as a go-between among warring countries, using her own funds.
In order to finance her “personal diplomacy,” she bears all expenses. Kaoru’s network of contacts include many “big names” of whom the staff at TV stations say “Even with our connections, there is no way we can approach these people,” and this is linked to the fact that Kaoru, who is not affiliated with any organization, travels the world at her own expense and as a private citizen. Saddam Hussein, Moammar Gadhafi, top North Korean leaders, and other important figures that western journalists are unable to meet, talk with her-- the main reason being “Princess Nakamaru is not a person who is moved by personal motives and so we considered a meeting with her.”
In response to her personal diplomacy Kaoru established the “International Affairs Institute for World Peace” in New York in 1985, and in 1991, the “Following the Sun Association” was organized for people aspiring toward peace. In doing so, royalty and presidents from various countries as well as cultural figures signed their names to the statement, “I endorse all of your activities,” and these people have been welcomed as advisers and special members. Accordingly, this began in earnest a movement of enlightenment in which the realization of a “one world” policy where the “path of life” is based on mutual understanding and trust, and not on a “one world” policy where the “path of power” is based on military power and tension. Since her days as an interviewer, she has so far traveled to as many as 186 countries.
Nakamaru’s aim is for a “world peace through human renaissance. Wealth, fame, power do not make humans happy, as true happiness is borne from a heart filled with love, harmony, and peace. When there is peace within the hearts of each person, from VIPs to average citizens, then world peace is realized. The phrase ”one world” mistakenly conjures up a religious movement, but Nakamaru has absolutely no religion ties. Nakamaru believes in a religion of her own, but does not belong to any group, saying that “The world transcends all the many religions, races, ideologies so there cannot be just one.
As for her personal life, in 1966 she married Tadao Nakamaru, an actor who worked with Toshiro Mifune. She has a son and a daughter.
In addition, she has maintained a close friendship with South Korea through its former prime minister, Kim Jong-Pil, and with North Korea through the late Kim Il Sung as well as Kim Yong Sun the Secretary of North Korea’s Worker Party (who died in 2003 in a car accident), and has strived to improve relations between Japan and both Koreas as a bridge between the Japanese and Korean governments by bringing about the temporary return of a Japanese woman while at the same time acting as a mediator in bringing about a summit meeting between South and North Korea.
Kaoru Nakamaru  



Here is the cartoon Italian member of the Illuminati speaking out in an interview with Benjamin Fulford.  
In this clip suspiciously he sounds much better and is not overriding anyone else.  
It's as if he knows his script now and is willing to appear other than a total lunatic, 
trying to rubbish the effectiveness of another speaker.


He's about as convincing as an Italian ice cream salesman pitching for the job of area manager.  
Fulford is keen to pump up the importance of the White Dragon Society.  
It's like two nutters in a hotel room trying to tell the world that they are in charge.


At least Princes Kaoru seemed entirely natural and genuine.  Can we have more of her next time.


Here's Fulford and the ice cream salesman in full if you can take it...


Text above corrupted by their usual methods.  I've done my best to clear the corruption, 
lost a bit of it but nothing serious


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqPg-mc1CIQ&feature=player_embedded#at=239

Here is Princess Kaoru on Youtube from 2009

http://www.bluestarprophecy.com/princess-karu-nakamaru-of-japan/
Kaoru Nakamaru