Thorium Oxide? That'll Do It A Lot Cheaper And Safer.
Email from BRIT -
Think you could do a blog on nuclear power?. Let me explain. A few weeks ago I watched a video given by Nick Griffin to the European Parliament in which he castigated the MEP's for wanting to squander billions on virtually useless wind turbines and then went on, asking why no one was pursuing thorium nuclear power. I'd never heard of this.
Lo and behold, three days ago I received my copy of the newspaper "UK Column",issue no.2, from Lawful Rebellion, and the whole of page 4 was dedicated to this very subject.
There is even a cutaway drawing of a SSTAR ( Small, Sealed, Transportable, Autonomous reactor) that will be available as a 500 ton 100 MegaWatt version or a 200 ton 10 MegaWatt version. The full page is too much to show here, but if I may condense one chapter:
"When nuclear power was first thought about, there were two parallel strands of research. One was the use of Uranium as a nuclear fuel, the other was the use of Thorium. Uranium won that battle, and reasons are simple - because Uranium is scarce, and the elites (Rothschild) control the mining companies. Thorium is plentiful, widely distributed,(even in the sea). Most important for the elites, Uranium is weaponisable, Thorium isn't."
There is lots more, and I strongly recommend that you send for a copy of the paper. From your vantage point of The Tap, you could do far more than I, to validate any of these claims and give the publicity it perhaps needs.
Keep up the good work.
more from globalwhisperer.com